On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:39:13AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 03:35:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > >> Changing that to look globally can certainly be done. It takes a bit > >> of work I think, as there are no API endpoints today that will do > >> that, but those could be added. > > > > Ah. Personally, I'd settle for it checking -hackers, -docs and -bugs. > > Perhaps there's some case for -general as well. > > FWIW, I have seen cases for -general in the past.
I was under the impression that posting patches to -hackers meant an implicit acknowledge that this code can be used by the Postgres project under the Postgres license and the PGDG copyright. Is this the same for all lists, and/or does this need to be amended then somehow (or am I getting this totally wrong)? I assume the point of cross-linking patches to the commitfest is to get them into Postgres after all. Also, I'd have expected that any meaningful patch surfacing on -general would be cross-posted to -hackers anyway (less/not so for -bugs and -docs). Michael -- Michael Banck Projektleiter / Senior Berater Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171 Fax: +49 2166 9901-100 Email: michael.ba...@credativ.de credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080 USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209 Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Sascha Heuer Unser Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten unterliegt folgenden Bestimmungen: https://www.credativ.de/datenschutz
