Hi hackers, On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:48:23 +1300 Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:43 AM Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > > >> Thank you very much! I'm going to send a new patch set until the end of > > >> this week (I'm sorry I was very busy in the release of Postgres Pro > > >> 11...). > > > > > > Is anyone interested in rebasing this, and summarising what needs to > > > be done to get it in? It's arguably a bug or at least quite > > > unfortunate that pgbench doesn't work with SERIALIZABLE, and I heard > > > that a couple of forks already ship Marina's patch set. I got interested in this and now looking into the patch and the past discussion. If anyone other won't do it and there are no objection, I would like to rebase this. Is that okay? Regards, Yugo NAGATA > > > > I'm a reviewer on this patch, that I find a good thing (tm), and which was > > converging to a reasonable and simple enough addition, IMHO. > > > > If I proceed in place of Marina, who is going to do the reviews? > > Hi Fabien, > > Cool. I'll definitely take it for a spin if you post a fresh patch > set. Any place that we arbitrarily don't support SERIALIZABLE, I > consider a bug, so I'd like to commit this if we can agree it's ready. > It sounds like it's actually in pretty good shape. -- Yugo NAGATA <nag...@sraoss.co.jp>