On 5/25/21 10:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: >> Perhaps we should add that read-only files can be particularly problematic. > Given the (legitimate, IMO) example of a read-only SSL key, I'm not > quite convinced that pg_rewind doesn't need to cope with this. > >
If we do decide to do something the question arises what should it do? If we're to allow for it I'm wondering if the best thing would be simply to ignore such a file. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
