On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 03:17:37PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > If we do decide to do something the question arises what should it do? > If we're to allow for it I'm wondering if the best thing would be simply > to ignore such a file.
Enforcing assumptions that any file could be ready-only is a very bad idea, as that could lead to weird behaviors if a FS is turned as becoming read-only suddenly while doing a rewind. Another idea that has popped out across the years was to add an option to pg_rewind so as users could filter files manually. That could be easily dangerous though in the wrong hands, as one could think that it is a good idea to skip a control file, for example. The thing is that here we actually know the set of files we'd like to ignore most of the time, and we still want to have some automated control what gets filtered. So here is a new idea: we build a list of files based on a set of GUC parameters using postgres -C on the target data folder, and assume that these are safe enough to be skipped all the time, if these are in the data folder. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
