On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:47 AM tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com <tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > > I think we should not reinterpret the severity of the error and lower > > it. Especially, in this case, any kind of errors can be thrown. It > > could be such a serious error that FDW developer wants to report to > > the client. Do we lower even PANIC to a lower severity such as > > WARNING? That's definitely a bad idea. If we don’t lower PANIC whereas > > lowering ERROR (and FATAL) to WARNING, why do we regard only them as > > non-error? > > Why does the client have to know the error on a remote server, whereas the > global transaction itself is destined to commit?
It's not necessarily on a remote server. It could be a problem with the local server. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
