At Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:32:14 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote in > On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:47 AM tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com > <tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > > > I think we should not reinterpret the severity of the error and lower > > > it. Especially, in this case, any kind of errors can be thrown. It > > > could be such a serious error that FDW developer wants to report to > > > the client. Do we lower even PANIC to a lower severity such as > > > WARNING? That's definitely a bad idea. If we don’t lower PANIC whereas > > > lowering ERROR (and FATAL) to WARNING, why do we regard only them as > > > non-error? > > > > Why does the client have to know the error on a remote server, whereas the > > global transaction itself is destined to commit? > > It's not necessarily on a remote server. It could be a problem with > the local server.
Isn't it a discussion about the errors from postgres_fdw? regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center