On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 12:49:42AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > I'm on the fence TBH, I can see that it's really small things and it > seems we have the patches, but it's late, late enough that > benchmarking gurus are showing up to benchmark with it for real, and > it's not great to be getting in the way of that with what is mostly > refactoring work, so I don't think it would be a bad thing if we > agreed to try again in 15. (A number of arguments for and against > moving pgbench out of the postgresql source tree and release cycle > occur to me, but I guess that's a topic for another thread.)
I may be missing something of course, but I don't see any strong reason why we need to do a revert here if we have patches to discuss first. >> Note that Michaël is having a look at fixing pgbench logging issues. > > Yeah I've been catching up with these threads. Thomas, do you want me to look more at this issue? I don't feel comfortable with the idea of doing anything if you are planning to look at this thread and you are the owner here, so that should be your call. From what I can see, we have the same area getting patched with patches across two threads, so it seems better to give up the other thread and just focus on the discussion here, where v7 has been sent: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210617175542.ad6b9b82926d8469e8520...@sraoss.co.jp https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAF7igB1r6wRfSCEAB-iZBKxkowWY6%2BdFF2jObSdd9%2BiVK%2BvHJg%40mail.gmail.com -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
