Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 6/28/21 8:52 AM, David Rowley wrote:
>> I wasn't too sure about the status of this one. Michael did mention it
>> in [1], but Tom mentioned that was on purpose to ease backpatching.
>> I'm not too clear on if Tom intended it should stay unindented until
>> "rewriting that whole function in a little bit".
> I'll let Tom speak for himself, but I somewhat doubt he meant the code
> to stay badly indented for more than a short period of time.
I did not. If you can give me an hour or so, I'll get the patch
I previously proposed [1] committed, and then this issue will go away.
regards, tom lane
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1573181.1624220108%40sss.pgh.pa.us
