On Thursday, September 2, 2021 2:36 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 11:14 AM tanghy.f...@fujitsu.com > <tanghy.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > 3. When using '\dn+', I noticed that the list of publications only contains > > the > > publications for "SCHEMA", "FOR ALL TABLES" publications are not shown. Is > > it > designed on purpose? > > (The result of '\d+' lists the publications of "SCHEAME" and "FOR ALL > > TABLES"). > > > > For example: > > create schema sch1; > > create table sch1.tbl(a int); > > create publication pub_schema for all tables in schema sch1; > > create publication pub_all_tables for all tables; > > I'm not sure if it is intentional or not, Do you want to post the > question in a separate thread and see if that should be handled? >
Sorry, maybe I didn't make my last question clearly enough. In HEAD(where schema level is not supported for publication), there is no publication information in the result of '\dn+'. With this schema patch, '\dn+' shows the publications related to the schema, but ALL TABLES publications are not shown. Do you think we should add ALL TABLES publications, too? Regards Tang
