On 9/4/21, 10:26 AM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > Attached are the same patches as last night, except I added a test for > XLOG_DEBUG where pertinent. (The elog(PANIC) is not made conditional on > that, since it's a cross-check rather than informative.) Also fixed the > silly pg_rewind mistake I made. > > I'll work on the new xlog record early next week.
Are these patches in a good state for some preliminary testing? I'd like to try them out, but I'll hold off if they're not quite ready yet. Nathan
