Hi, On 2021-09-03 12:55:23 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Oh, but of course we can't modify XLogReaderState in backbranches to add > the new struct member abortedContrecordPtr (or whatever we end up naming > that.)
Why is that? Afaict it's always allocated via XLogReaderAllocate(), so adding a new field at the end should be fine? That said, I'm worried that this stuff is too complicated to get right in the backbranches. I suspect letting it stew in master for a while before backpatching would be a good move. Greetings, Andres Freund
