The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I vote for just renaming it to chr(). Any objections?
> first thing off the top of my head ... was there a reason why it was added
> to contrib/odbc? ignoring the "oracle documentation", is it something
> that is/was needed for ODBC?
Now that I look, it seems ODBC specifies the function as "char()",
which means contrib/odbc is wrong on that score too :-(
New proposal: forget ichar(), give the function two entries chr() and
char().
regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in postgres Alex Sokoloff
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in post... Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion... Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conver... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character c... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to charact... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to cha... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to cha... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to cha... The Hermit Hacker
- odbc (was: Re: [HACKERS] a... Karel Zak
- Re: odbc (was: Re: [HACKER... Tom Lane
- Re: odbc (was: Re: [HACKER... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conver... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in post... Alex Sokoloff
