Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't want make some changes to contrib/odbc, because it's out of
> me... but I have a question, Why in the contrib/odbc/odbc.c are total
> same function as in oracle_compat.c (like ascii(), ichar(), repeat())?
contrib/odbc was a quick hack just before 7.0 release; we had already
frozen the system catalogs for 7.0, and didn't want to force another
initdb for beta testers. It's not supposed to survive into 7.1 --- most
or all of what's in there should be, or perhaps already has been, merged
into the main code.
Thomas did the work on that originally, and might remember more about
whether any of the ODBC compatibility functions ought *not* go into
the main tree.
regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in postgres Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in post... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in ... Karel Zak
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conver... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character c... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to charact... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to charact... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to charact... The Hermit Hacker
- odbc (was: Re: [HACKERS] ascii... Karel Zak
- Re: odbc (was: Re: [HACKERS] a... Tom Lane
- Re: odbc (was: Re: [HACKERS] a... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] ascii to character conversion in postgres Alex Sokoloff
