At 02:13 PM 11/16/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>> I think the default should probably be no delay, and the documentation
>> on enabling this needs to be clear and obvious (i.e. hard to miss).
>
>I just talked to Tom Lane about this.  I think a sleep(0) just before
>the flush would be the best.  It would reliquish the cpu slice if
>another process is ready to run.  If no other backend is running, it
>probably just returns.  If there is another one, it gives it a chance to
>complete.  On return from sleep(0), it can check if it still needs to
>flush.  This would tend to bunch up flushers so they flush only once,
>while not delaying cases where only one backend is running.

This sounds like an interesting approach, yes.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
  Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
  http://donb.photo.net.

Reply via email to