Re: [HACKERS] RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c)

[Tom Samplonius]

On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> * Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001116 12:09] wrote:
> > * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001116 14:02]:
> > > > > This sounds like an interesting approach, yes.
> > > > Question: Is sleep(0) guaranteed to at least give up control? 
> > > > 
> > > > The way I read my UnixWare 7's man page, it might not, since alarm(0)
> > > > just cancels the alarm...
> > > 
> > > Well, it certainly is a kernel call, and most OS's re-evaluate on kernel
> > > call return.
> > BUT, do we know for sure that sleep(0) is not optimized in the library
> > to just return? 
> 
> sleep(3) should conform to POSIX specification, if anyone has the
> reference they can check it to see what the effect of sleep(0)
> should be.

  Yes, but Posix also specifies sched_yield() which rather explicitly
allows a process to yield its timeslice.  No idea how well that is
supported.

> -- 
> -Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."

Tom