Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I handling this properly? I hate to be dragging around the unix
> socket directory name in pghost for too long and hate to be propogating
> the slash test throughout the code.
It's probably cleanest to do that the way you are doing it. However,
one could argue we should make PQhost() return
pghost ? pghost : pgunixsocket
which'd make the external behavior compatible with the way one specifies
the connection.
Basically, the idea was to *not* have a distinct unixsocket spec
anywhere in libpq's external API, so that existing apps wouldn't need
a rewrite to support this feature. Keeping unixsocket separate inside
the library is a good idea, but it's independent of the API.
regards, tom lane
