Denis Perchine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You will get SIGKILL in most cases. Well, a SIGKILL will cause the postmaster to shut down and restart the other backends, so we should be safe if that happens. (Annoyed as heck, maybe, but safe.) Anyway, this is looking more and more like the SIGTERM that caused your vacuum to die must have been done manually. The CRIT_SECTION code that I'm about to go off and add to spinlocking should prevent similar problems from happening in 7.1, but I don't think it's reasonable to try to retrofit that into 7.0.*. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Denis Perchine
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Denis Perchine
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Denis Perchine
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Denis Perchine
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Denis Perchine
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange cra... Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] Quite strange crash Vadim Mikheev