Patrick Welche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Wouldn't a -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib have helped? Well, yeah, but how would we know to do that? The fact that gcc is searching /usr/local/lib is completely unknown to configure. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... selkovjr
- [HACKERS] Getting configure to... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Getting configur... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Getting conf... Patrick Welche
- [HACKERS] R-Tree implementatio... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] R-Tree implementatio... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] R-Tree implement... Bruce Momjian
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: ... Tom Lane