[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>>> on which configure didn't detect the absence of libz.so >> >> Really? Details please. It's hard to see how it could have messed >> up on that. > I didn't look well enough -- I apologize. The library is there, but > ld.so believes it is not: > typhoon> postmaster > ld.so.1: postmaster: fatal: libz.so: open failed: No such file or directory > Killed Odd. Can you show us the part of config.log that relates to zlib? It's strange that configure's check to see if zlib is linkable should succeed, only to have the live startup fail. Is it possible that you ran configure with a different library search path (LD_LIBRARY_PATH or local equivalent) than you are using now? It's suspicious that the error message mentions libz.so when the actual file name is libz.so.1, but I still don't see how that could result in configure's link test succeeding but the executable not running. regards, tom lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... selkovjr
- [HACKERS] Getting configure to... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Getting configur... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Getting conf... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Getting conf... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] R-Tree implementatio... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] R-Tree implement... Bruce Momjian
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov