The Hermit Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The easy fix is to just set the delay to zero. Looks like that will fix
>> most of the problem.
> Except that Vadim had a reason for setting it to 5,
He claimed to have seen better performance with a nonzero delay.
So far none of the rest of us have been able to duplicate that.
Perhaps he was using a machine where a 5-microsecond select() delay
actually is 5 microseconds? If so, he's the outlier, not the
rest of us ...
regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] beta5 ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: beta5 ... Lincoln Yeoh
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: beta5 ... Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Re: beta5 ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: beta5 ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: beta5 ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: beta5 ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: beta5 ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Peter T Mount
- RE: [HACKERS] beta5 ... Michael Ansley
- [HACKERS] Re: beta5 ... Thomas Lockhart
