> > The easy fix is to just set the delay to zero. Looks like that will fix
> > most of the problem.
>
> Except that Vadim had a reason for setting it to 5, and I'm loath to see
> that changed unless someone actaully understands the ramifications other
> then increasing performance ...
See post from a few minutes ago with analysis of purpose and actual
affect of Vadim's parameter. I objected to the delay when it was
introduced because of my analysis, but Vadim's argument is that 5
microseconds is very small delay, just enough to yield the CPU. We now
see that is much longer than that.
>
> > The near-committers thing may indeed be overkill, and certainly is not
> > worth holding beta.
>
> What is this 'near-committers thing'??
Other backends about to commit.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
