Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know it is easy for you, but the number of reports and problems we
> hear about shows it is an issue for some.
We hear some reports, but not a lot. We have no idea whatever what
problems might ensue if we used mmap instead. I'm dubious that SysV
shmem creates enough problems to justify replacing it with a solution
of essentially unknown portability characteristics...
regards, tom lane
- Re[3]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c jamexu
- Re[3]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c Thomas Lockhart
- Re: Re[3]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Re[3]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c Bruce Momjian
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... Bruce Momjian
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... Bruce Momjian
- Re[4]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c Tom Lane
- Re[4]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c Xu Yifeng
- Re[4]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... Bruce Momjian
