Hello Tom, Tuesday, February 27, 2001, 12:45:18 PM, you wrote: TL> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I know it is easy for you, but the number of reports and problems we >> hear about shows it is an issue for some. TL> We hear some reports, but not a lot. We have no idea whatever what TL> problems might ensue if we used mmap instead. I'm dubious that SysV TL> shmem creates enough problems to justify replacing it with a solution TL> of essentially unknown portability characteristics... TL> regards, tom lane could anyone investigate mmap() in many modern UNIX systems to prove that mmap() is so un-portable? it seems mmap() is a portable problem like you said, but I think SYSV shmem for PGSQL is a installation problem. you push some difficults to end user, and take easy taskes for yourself. Xu Yifeng
- Re[3]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c Thomas Lockhart
- Re: Re[3]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Re[3]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c Bruce Momjian
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... Bruce Momjian
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... Bruce Momjian
- Re: Re[2]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... Tom Lane
- Re[4]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c Xu Yifeng
- Re[4]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog.c The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Re[4]: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A patch for xlog... Bruce Momjian