> >> Remove archdir from pg_control; it ought to be a GUC > >> parameter, not a special case (not that it's implemented > yet anyway). > > > Is archdir really a GUC parameter ? > > Why shouldn't it be? I see nothing wrong with changing it on-the-fly. Yes, I think this is a good change, like all others except XID assignment :-) Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- RE: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- RE: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL ch... Peter Eisentraut
- AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Vadim Mikheev
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL cha... Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL cha... Tom Lane