Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do I have to send SIGHUP after changing postgresql.conf ? In general, yes. I think that for the (still vaporware) archdir option, you might not need to: archdir will only be looked at by the checkpoint subprocess, and I think that a newly spawned backend will reread postgresql.conf anyway. Peter, is that correct? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
- AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- RE: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL ch... Peter Eisentraut
- AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Vadim Mikheev
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL cha... Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL cha... Tom Lane
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed WAL changes Hiroshi Inoue