Marko Kreen writes: > OK: Linux 2.4.2 i686 / gcc 2.95.2 / Debian testing/unstable > > no problems. > > OK?: NetBSD 1.5 i586 / egcs 2.91.66 / (netbsd-1-5 from Jan) > > netbsd FAILED the geometry test, diff attached, dunno if its > critical or not. Can you check whether it matches any of the other possible geometry results? See http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/regress-platform.html about the mechanisms. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platfor... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platfor... Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Adriaan Joubert
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms (linux 2.4.x ?) Franck Martin
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms (linux 2.4.x ?... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms (linux 2.4.x ?... Roberto Mello
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Marko Kreen
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Marko Kreen
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platforms Giles Lean
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for platfor... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for pla... Marko Kreen
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for pla... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for pla... Giles Lean
- Re: [HACKERS] Call for pla... Patrick Welche
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for pla... Patrick Welche