Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > I don't have a problem with that, but I think core code committers > > and www maintainers should be indentified separately. > > Why? Then we have to also separate advocacy which is just as important > and pgfoundry... as well as possibly a host of others. We all have our > job in the community :). > > > On a closely > > related note: last time I looked there was no way for anyone to > > discover on the web site who the committers actually are. That would > > also probably be useful. > > See Dave's response about core not wanting committers that easily > identified. I actually recall this argument, basically there are times > when commit access might be revoked temporarily etc... IIRC..
I believe the reason we don't publicise who is a committer is that we have non-committers who do a lot more for the project. Commit rights are usually given to people who do a lot of patches (perhaps small ones) while people who develop larger patches are less likely to get commit rights rapidly. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
