On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 13:44 +0100, Csaba Nagy wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 11:12 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > > Features > > - Read Only Tables > > - Compressed Tablespaces > > I wonder if instead of read-only tables wouldn't it be better to have > some kind of automatic partitioning
That's definitely on my list of requirements for partitioning. > which permits to have different > chunks of the table data in different tablespaces, and a freeze command > which effectively moves the data from the (normally small) active chunk > to the archive chunk when it's transaction id is older than a predefined > threshold ? As Hannu says, this is exactly what the other features will allow, so Yes! -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
