On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 17:27 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2007 schrieb Alvaro Herrera: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > I figured it would make sense if pgarch.c used the same mechanism that > > > postmaster.c uses to report the various variants of regular and signal > > > exits. > > > > Hmm. Getting rid of the "(PID 0)" is going to be a mess enough for > > translations that I think it is worth pgarch.c having its own routine > > for this. Furthermore I think the detailed archive command should be > > reported in an errdetail() field, which makes it even farther off. > > Better patch.
Looks much easier to understand. I prefer archive_command = ... for the errdetail though. The commands can be quite long so the extra words don't really add anything, plus they require translation. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
