Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Better patch.
Doesn't this patch break the behavior that is documented in the comment?
Specifically, the case where the restore_command dies on a signal and
this is reported to us by the controlling shell as exitcode > 128.
We want the archiver to die, but this patch makes it not do so.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
