Tom Lane wrote: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It's worse than that in this case. This is an *impressively* broken > > configuration. > > Understatement of the week. The mail includes absolutely no evidence > about what message is allegedly being filtered. Are you sure that > this is really a filtering engine at all, and not just random spam > hoping to draw responses from careless people? I've heard of web > comment-spammers who try to get other people to decode captchas > for them this way. > > Adding to my suspicion is that I don't recall having seen one of these > personally, and if it were really tied to posting on any of the PG > lists, I shoulda seen a lot ;-)
Yeah, I think it comes from pgsql-performance. I just got one mentioning an address to which I had responded some minutes before. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
