Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm still not very happy with any of the options here.
> BAS is great if you didn't want to trash the cache, but its also > annoying to people that really did want to load a large table into > cache. However we set it, we're going to have problems because not > everybody has the same database. That argument leads immediately to the conclusion that you need per-table control over the behavior. Which maybe you do, but it's far too late to be proposing it for 8.3. We should put this whole area of more-control-over-BAS-and-syncscan on the TODO agenda. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings