Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > OK, but keep in mind if we use synchronized_seqscans in pg_dump we will > > have to recognize that GUC forever. > > No, because it's being used on the query side, not in the emitted dump. > We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server > version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard > error, rather than something people could override with -i.
Oh, yea, interesting, it is part of the connection. That will help. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
