Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I vote we just decide that GSS isn't going to be supported on protocol
>> V2, and put a suitable error message into the server for that. It
>> doesn't seem to me that this combination is worth the amount of
>> contortions it would require to support.
> Agreed. The cost is rapidly becoming too high. But we certainly can't
> change the protocol for the stuff that actually does work.
This problem applies to SSPI too, correct?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
