-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:36:56 -0800 Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If there is any significant I/O latency for a single backend, it seems > like a context switch could be a win for processor utilization. It > might not be a win overall, but at least potentially a win. Do we want a 20% potential win or an 80% potential win? I would personally rather keep it simple, hard core, and data shoving as possible without any issue with scheduling etc.. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHwx+EATb/zqfZUUQRAvOgAJ4vWCO74XzXy9Pbzqz3otWoqKI3HgCfRwUI ZLd0SOgf5jnInZvOxCS+iNU= =Syk1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
