On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:11:16 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
O.k. with 24 connections 3.5 hours. Testing with 12 now. 6 never finished due to a bug. Observations: As simple as this solution is, it is not eloquent nor is it smart. Using this method, if you have a 100GB table (which is very common) you are still bound in a bad way by a single connection and you are holding up everyone else. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
