On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Jan Urbański <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> 2. Implement better selectivity estimates for FTS. > > > > +1 for that one ... > > OK, this one might very well be the one that'd be more useful. And I can > always reuse the other idea for my thesis, after expanding it a bit. > Speaking of @@ selectivity, I even mailed about it once on the > -performance list, but the mail somehow got lost in the processing queue > and never reached the list. Anyway, the idea has been on my mind for > some time now. > So are you considering putting FTS selectivity estimates on this year's > SoC ideas list? That is, if PostgreSQL is planning to participate in SoC > this year, which I'm sure it does ;)
We are - but the idea doesn't need to be on the list for us to consider it. Just write up a good project outline and plan ready to submit when the doors open. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your Subscription: http://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr?domain=postgresql.org&extra=pgsql-hackers
