Tom Lane wrote: > "Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The first commitfest has been on for about a week now, but I haven't > > seem much festivities going on. > > Yeah, we are a bit behind on starting it :-(. Bruce was traveling > until the end of February and is still not caught up on updating > his list of open patches. And I had some Red Hat responsibilities > to take care of, as well as personal matters, and was happy to let > it slip a few days. But we need to get on with it. > > > Do we plan to drain Bruce's patch queue completely during this > > commitfest? Or the items on the developer wiki TODO:PatchStatus list? > > Right at the moment the raw data is still in Bruce's patch queue. > It's becoming increasingly obvious that that isn't going to work; > we can't have one man being a complete bottleneck for the entire > process. I concur with your other suggestion to try to move to > a wiki-based patch list, though it's unclear to me just how we > should manage that. I think I'd prefer a small number of people > (but more than just Bruce) responsible for updating the queue.
Consider I am collecting all our open items from the past 10 months. Even when I am done the patch queue is going to be a load of work --- take a look at what is there now. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
