Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Since there are 19 pages and probably less than 19 interested hackers, > >> maybe we could just each take a page of the list as it stands and go > >> through it at that level? Although many of the threads cross pages, so > >> that's not ideal. Any other ideas? > > > The problem is that as they are deleted, they will move. Perhaps I can > > just comment on them to close them and not delete anything. > > Ah, right. And the other problem is additions of new messages to > threads. So the page boundaries can't be expected to stay stable for > long.
Oh, yea, if I add things to the list they would bump things around. Perhaps we can just skip the idea that the URLs are constant and rely on the comments as staying with the emails. > The comment thing is kinda cool, but I don't feel very comfortable about > using the comments for anything substantive. Actual reviews of patches, > for example, need to still be sent on the mailing lists so that they'll > go into the archives. I suggest we just use the comments for status > annotations, like "done" or "no patch here, make a TODO" or "needs > review, I will review". Yea, the comments are to prompt people about what we need to do. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
