On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 09:42 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I think if you post something marked Work In Progress, there is an > implied commitment on your part to post something complete at a later stage. > > So if it's forgotten you would be the one doing the forgetting. ;-)
But if they aren't on a review list, they won't get reviewed, no matter what their status. So everybody has to maintain their own status list and re-submit patches for review monthly until reviewed? I like the idea of marking things WIP, but I think we need a clear system where we agree that multiple statuses exist and that they are described in particular ways. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
