Teodor Sigaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hmm, I can see how some middleware would help with folding or not >> folding the input token, but what about the words coming from the >> dictionary file (particularly the *output* lexeme)? It's not apparent >> to me that it's sensible to try to control that from outside the >> dictionary.
> Right now I see an significant advantage of such layer: two possible > extension > of dictionary (filtering and storing original form) are independent from > nature > of dictionary. So, instead of modifying of every dictionary we can add some > layer, common for all dictionary. With syntax like: > CREATE/ALTER TEXT SEARCH DICTIONARY foo (...) WITH ( filtering=on|off, > store_original=on|off ); > Or per token's type/dictionary pair. Well, if you think this can/should be done somewhere outside the dictionary, should I revert the applied patch? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers