Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy
>> and forgot about shipping it in tarballs.

> The problem with not shipping the TODO file at all is that TODO gives
> users a list of all known bugs/missing features in that major release. 

This seems to me to be nonsense.  You've never maintained the
back-branch versions of the TODO list, so they're out of date anyway
--- ie, they don't account for problems discovered post-release.

In any case I've always thought that the TODO was developer-oriented
documentation, not something users would read.  If there's a shortcoming
in a feature, it ought to be documented in the SGML manual.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to