Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy >> and forgot about shipping it in tarballs.
> The problem with not shipping the TODO file at all is that TODO gives > users a list of all known bugs/missing features in that major release. This seems to me to be nonsense. You've never maintained the back-branch versions of the TODO list, so they're out of date anyway --- ie, they don't account for problems discovered post-release. In any case I've always thought that the TODO was developer-oriented documentation, not something users would read. If there's a shortcoming in a feature, it ought to be documented in the SGML manual. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers