Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy > >> and forgot about shipping it in tarballs. > > > The problem with not shipping the TODO file at all is that TODO gives > > users a list of all known bugs/missing features in that major release. > > This seems to me to be nonsense. You've never maintained the > back-branch versions of the TODO list, so they're out of date anyway > --- ie, they don't account for problems discovered post-release.
It is a best effort with our limited resources. > In any case I've always thought that the TODO was developer-oriented > documentation, not something users would read. If there's a shortcoming > in a feature, it ought to be documented in the SGML manual. It typically isn't, except for major issues, again due to lack of resources. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
