Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Fine - once per transaction instead of once per insert. Still, if there > is overhead to this (updating a secondary summary table), does it really > make sense to have it for every table?
We certainly wouldn't accept a patch that imposed this overhead on every table. One of the advantages of framing it as an explicit set of triggers is that then you have a natural way of indicating which table(s) you want the feature for (and are willing to pay the overhead to get it). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers