"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> >> I'm not sure I follow. I tried last week to give some hours for patch >> review. What actually happened was that I had to wade through a ton of >> stuff, skipping patches that were already applied, threads that were >> purely discussion but not patches, threads about earlier versions of >> some patches. > > Yep, that describes the painful process well. > > I have tried to stay on top of patches already applied but I am doing a > clock sweep over the queue and you probably caught a spot I was nearing. I've also tried to find stuff I could review and failed repeatedly. I have a week now where I could spend a lot of time on this so I'll try again. Am i looking at the right list though? The one I'm looking at still starts with a patch to which Tom commented "This is superseded by a later submission" which I think has been there since pretty much the start of the commitfest. > You can download an mbox of the entire queue if that helps. >> >> Also I don't know what patches we have for the next commitfest. I would >> gladly give some time to put up a Wiki page to list the patches for the >> next commitfest. Would that be helpful? I tried this once already. I dumped the first page of Bruce's queue into a wiki page and laid it out in a column. But I wanted to add links back to the messages in the archive and ran into a problem with that. It also would have been a pain because Bruce's list is divided up into pages. If we modify the archives to have a URL to go straight to a message-id and Bruce generated a list all on one page including comments and message-ids then I could process them all into a wiki page in a few hours. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services! - Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
