Tom Lane wrote: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Am i looking at the right list though? The one I'm looking at still starts > > with a patch to which Tom commented "This is superseded by a later > > submission" > > which I think has been there since pretty much the start of the commitfest. > > Yeah, there is still a boatload of stuff that could be removed from the > patch queue. I think that Bruce is intentionally leaving in all traffic > related to an open patch, which is okay by me as long as the obsolete > versions are properly commented. But I wish he'd get on with removing > the stuff that is marked as already committed (some in 8.3!).
I am doing a clock sweep through the list, and it takes a week for each cycle. > > > It also would have > > been a pain because Bruce's list is divided up into pages. > > That's been a pain in the rear since the start. Bruce, could we combine > it into one page now that it's relatively short? Sure. Done. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
