Andrew Dunstan napsal(a):
Zdeněk Kotala wrote:
Question is also how many users really use these commands. For example
vacuumdb is not too important now when we have autovacuum.
This is not true. Plenty of apps will quite reasonably choose to follow
large batch updates by a single vacuumdb rather than using autovacuum.
Yes, up to 8.2, but I think situation for 8.3 could be different. We have more
works, autovacuum is better and so on.
Incidentally, I am less opposed than some to some sensible renaming
here, eventually. Perhaps we could take the opportunity to fix the
naming of initdb, which confuses the heck out of many people.
Instead of renaming initdb extend pg_ctl (pg_ctl init) seems to me as a better
idea.
Zdenek
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
