Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> If anyone squawks we could think about a >> faster update ...
> That assumes that someone working on using the planner hooks will read > this thread - which might be reasonable - I guess they number of likely > users is fairly small. But if they might miss it then it would be best > to fix it ASAP, ISTM. Well, it's not like we have never before changed internal APIs in a minor update. (There have been security-related cases where we gave *zero* notice of such changes.) Nor am I willing to surrender the option to do so again. If there's somebody out there with a real problem with this change, they need to speak up. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers