On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, the lack of any formal testing of the extended-Query protocol > is a real problem. I'm not sure of a good fix, but it bears some > thinking about. Not only do we not have an automated way to notice > if we broke functionality, but we don't really notice for either > extended or basic protocol if we hurt performance.
I just posted something to -hackers about the availability of boxes for QA purposes. It doesn't solve the problem by itself though. A good answer is probably to plan optional JDBC benchmarks in the benchfarm design - not all people want to run Java on their boxes but we have servers of our own to do so. Andrew? -- Guillaume -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
