Tom Lane wrote: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Just throwing out a crazy idea. What if we had a commitfest as > > scheduled at the start of May but made it a Tom-free commitfest. > > Specifically to try to organize a larger work-force rather than to > > leave it all on Tom's shoulders. Not that your efforts aren't > > appreciated but surely you wouldn't mind a break? > > It certainly did seem that Bruce and I were the only ones doing any > very serious amount of work for this fest. That's not sustainable, > folks.
Agreed. The main reason I didn't manage to do much, if any, reviewing this time is that everytime I started I had to browse through a bazillion emails trying to find what to do. By the time I was through that and had written a comment or two, I had no more time to work on reviews right then. Next time I got started, I got stuck in the same cycle. (and yes, that's generally because I haven't had much time to look at these things at all during this commit-fest). I know that blaming the tools is just an easy escape and sucks as an excuse. But I just didn't have the time to work out a way to workaround the limits of these tools to make it possible for me to get this done. The new version of the patch queue that's up now seems a lot more usable than it used to be, but it used to be really horrible :-P I still plan to do the win32 patch that's listed with my name, BTW. Just need to get my build environments properly sorted out. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
